This matters because it highlights the ongoing debate about how national identity is shaped and the role of cultural representation in a society. The exclusion of well-known cultural figures may alienate citizens and diminish the arts' significance.

We should always be suspicious when states try to define a national culture – especially when the arts are in crisisSweden is often associated with a large and efficient bureaucratic apparatus. It is also often associated with minimalist interiors furnished by simple pale woods such as birch and pine. It was therefore fitting that, after two years of preparation, the <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/sep/02/outcry-as-swedish-cultural-canon-snubs-abba-and-anything-since-1975">Swedish cultural canon</a> committee presented – in an anatomical theatre from the 17th century – its list of 100 works, ideas and brands that define Swedishness. In direct contrast to the anonymous grey conference rooms usually favoured by Swedish government officials, this unusual list was unveiled in a rather un-Swedish fashion. The contradiction is striking. It says something about how we think about culture, nationhood and identity today – not just in Sweden, but across the west. It also tells us why this canon is doomed to fail and yet for its creators, unfortunately, it has already succeeded.Originally a pet project of the far-right <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/jun/17/sweden-far-right-media-nordic-model">Sweden Democrats</a>, the canon was commissioned by the sitting rightwing coalition, a minority government dependent on the Sweden Democrats’ parliamentary support. Since the canon committee’s creation in 2023, the tone in Swedish media has been critical. Some have voiced a worry that the project is authoritarian in nature, some have questioned the legitimacy and purpose of the list and others have bickered over the contents of the list itself.Gabriel V Rindborg is a writer and cultural critic based in Stockholm <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/sep/04/sweden-cultural-canon-abba-ikea-meatballs">Continue reading...</a>

هذا مهم لأنه يسلط الضوء على النقاش المستمر حول كيفية تشكيل الهوية الوطنية ودور التمثيل الثقافي في المجتمع. قد يؤدي استبعاد الشخصيات الثقافية المعروفة إلى إبعاد المواطنين وتقليل أهمية الفنون.

أثار الكانون الثقافي الجديد في السويد انتقادات لاستبعاده عناصر أيقونية مثل آبا وتركيزه على تعريف بيروقراطي للثقافة الوطنية. وهذا يثير القلق بشأن تمثيل الفنون في البلاد.

Esto es importante porque resalta el debate en curso sobre cómo se forma la identidad nacional y el papel de la representación cultural en una sociedad. La exclusión de figuras culturales conocidas puede alienar a los ciudadanos y disminuir la importancia de las artes.

El nuevo canon cultural de Suecia ha generado críticas por excluir elementos icónicos como ABBA y centrarse en una definición burocrática de la cultura nacional. Esto plantea preocupaciones sobre la representación de las artes en el país.

Cela importe car cela met en lumière le débat en cours sur la façon dont l'identité nationale est façonnée et le rôle de la représentation culturelle dans une société. L'exclusion de figures culturelles bien connues peut aliéner les citoyens et diminuer l'importance des arts.

Le nouveau canon culturel de la Suède a suscité des critiques pour avoir exclu des éléments emblématiques comme ABBA et se concentrer sur une définition bureaucratique de la culture nationale. Cela soulève des inquiétudes concernant la représentation des arts dans le pays.

Sweden's new cultural canon has sparked criticism for excluding iconic elements like ABBA and focusing on a bureaucratic definition of national culture. This raises concerns about the representation of the arts in the country.

No Abba, no meatballs? Sweden’s new cultural canon is a listicle that will soon be forgotten | Gabriel V Rindborg

Was this article worth reading? Share it

Ready to build your own newsroom?