Israel has begun a 10-hour daily military pause in parts of Gaza to allow aid deliveries, but the UN says it’s nowhere near enough to prevent famine. The WHO reports malnutrition is spiraling out of control, with kids dying from starvation and airdrops barely making a dent in the crisis.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about temporary ceasefires—it’s about whether aid can actually reach people before it’s too late. The numbers are grim: kids are starving to death now, and the UN’s warnings make it clear these short pauses won’t fix the collapse of Gaza’s food and health systems. The stakes couldn’t be higher.

Nesrine Malik’s powerful piece captures the frustration of protesting against the starvation crisis in Gaza, where political leaders offer empty promises and minimal aid while children die from malnutrition and preventable diseases. She argues that even when activism feels futile, public pressure remains crucial—because history shows leaders can’t ignore outrage forever.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just another headline about Gaza—it’s a visceral reminder that behind the politics are real, suffering children whose lives hinge on global attention. Malik’s call to keep protesting, even when it feels hopeless, underscores a brutal truth: silence kills faster than bombs. For readers, it’s a challenge to stay engaged when the world’s response feels criminally inadequate.

Colombia's president has decided to stop shipping coal to Israel, citing concerns over the ongoing conflict in Gaza. The move comes after Israel allegedly ignored previous warnings from Colombia back in August 2024. It’s a significant step that could strain diplomatic and trade ties between the two countries.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about trade—it’s a political statement. Colombia is taking a stand on the Gaza war, and cutting off coal exports (a key resource for Israel) sends a strong message. It could ripple through global diplomacy, especially if other nations follow suit. For Israel, losing a major coal supplier adds pressure during an already volatile time. For Colombia, it’s a risky move that could backfire economically but may win support domestically or from allies critical of Israel’s actions. Either way, it’s a bold play in a high-stakes geopolitical game.

UK Labour leader Keir Starmer is set to meet former US President Donald Trump at his Turnberry golf resort in Scotland. The talks will focus on Gaza and trade, coming just a day after Trump brokered a fresh trade agreement between the US and the EU.

Editor’s Note: This meeting is a big deal because it signals Starmer’s attempt to engage with a potential future US president—especially on contentious issues like Gaza and post-Brexit trade. Whether it leads to anything concrete or just political posturing, it’s a notable moment in transatlantic relations.

In a surprising political rendezvous, UK Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer is set to meet former US President Donald Trump in Scotland to discuss the ongoing crisis in Gaza. The talks, scheduled for Monday, come at a tense moment in global diplomacy, with Starmer positioning himself as a potential future prime minister and Trump eyeing a return to the White House.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just a routine chat—it’s a collision of two political heavyweights with very different worldviews. Starmer’s engagement with Trump signals an attempt to navigate the complexities of US-UK relations ahead of potential leadership transitions. For Gaza, the meeting could hint at shifting diplomatic currents, though whether it leads to tangible outcomes remains to be seen. Either way, it’s a headline-grabber.

The Minns government has turned down a request by the Palestine Action Group to hold a pro-Palestine protest march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge, citing concerns about timing and potential disruptions. The activists wanted the bridge temporarily closed to draw attention to the conflict in Gaza, framing it as an effort to "help stop a genocide." Authorities, however, worry about logistical chaos and public inconvenience.

Editor’s Note: This decision highlights the tension between activist demands for visibility and government priorities around public order. Protests over Gaza have been polarizing globally, and this rejection signals authorities are wary of high-profile disruptions—even for a cause with passionate support. It also raises questions about how governments balance free speech with practical governance.

Conservation groups are sounding the alarm after new data shows land clearing in New South Wales has jumped by 40%, calling it a "major red flag" for the environment. Meanwhile, the Minns government has blocked a pro-Palestine protest from marching across the Sydney Harbour Bridge, citing timing and concerns about public disruption.

Editor’s Note: The surge in land clearing raises serious concerns about habitat destruction and biodiversity loss, especially as Australia already struggles with species decline. Blocking the protest also highlights tensions around public demonstrations—balancing free speech with order is always tricky, but it’s especially charged when tied to global issues like Gaza. Both stories reflect bigger debates: how we manage natural resources and how governments handle dissent.

International law expert Donald Rothwell argues that Australia needs to move beyond condemning Israel’s actions in Gaza and take concrete steps—like imposing sanctions and formally recognizing Palestine—to align its policies with its stated principles. Prime Minister Albanese recently called Israel’s conduct a breach of international law but stopped short of committing to tangible measures. Rothwell’s piece pushes for a stronger, more proactive stance.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just another opinion piece—it’s a direct challenge to Australia’s government to back its words with action. With global scrutiny on Gaza intensifying, Rothwell’s call reflects growing pressure on Western allies to shift from rhetoric to accountability. For readers, it raises a tough question: Should Australia risk diplomatic friction with Israel to take a stand on humanitarian grounds?

Over a thousand rabbis from around the world have joined forces to criticize Israel’s handling of aid to Gaza, accusing the government of using hunger as a weapon. Their open letter demands immediate action to allow more humanitarian assistance into the region, framing the issue as both a moral and ethical failure.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just another political statement—it’s a significant moral challenge coming from within the Jewish community itself. When religious leaders, many of whom likely support Israel’s right to exist, openly condemn its policies, it signals deepening fractures and adds pressure for change. The story highlights how the war’s humanitarian toll is straining even traditionally supportive voices.