Former President Donald Trump is pushing back hard against claims that his administration ever entertained a $30 billion deal to help Iran with its civil nuclear program. Calling the reports "fake news" and a "hoax," he insists the idea is absurd and meant to damage his reputation.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about Trump denying a story—it’s another flare-up in the long-running tension between U.S. leaders and Iran over nuclear policy. If true, a deal like this would’ve been a major shift, but Trump’s forceful denial keeps the focus on his combative stance toward Iran. For now, it’s more about political posturing than policy, but it’s a reminder of how volatile this relationship remains.

A top U.S. general, Dan Caine, disclosed in a classified briefing that the military opted not to use bunker-buster bombs on Iran’s Isfahan nuclear facility during a recent operation. The reason? The site was too deep underground. Instead, Tomahawk missiles were used, while other facilities like Fordow and Natanz were hit with bunker-busters. Intelligence indicates Isfahan and Fordow may house key nuclear assets, raising questions about the effectiveness of the strikes.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just a technical detail—it hints at the challenges of targeting deeply buried nuclear sites and the calculated choices behind U.S. military actions. The decision to hold back bunker-busters suggests either limitations in capability or a deliberate move to avoid escalating tensions further. Either way, it’s a glimpse into the high-stakes chess game of modern warfare.

The U.S. Senate narrowly shot down an effort to limit President Trump's ability to take military action against Iran without Congress' approval. The vote fell mostly along party lines, with 53 senators—mostly Republicans—blocking the measure, while 47 Democrats and independents supported it. The resolution was a direct response to rising tensions with Iran, but its failure means the White House retains broad authority to escalate conflict without lawmakers' sign-off.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just inside-the-Beltway drama—it’s about who gets to decide if America goes to war. The vote highlights how divided Congress is on reining in presidential power, especially when it comes to military action. With Iran still a flashpoint, the outcome leaves open the door for unilateral moves by the administration, raising concerns about unchecked escalation. For voters, it’s a reminder of how much weight these Senate votes carry, even if they don’t always make headlines.

Former President Donald Trump claims he can resolve tensions with North Korea if re-elected, but his comments also raised concerns among U.S. allies about potential security risks if his administration disregards long-standing alliance commitments.

Editor’s Note: Trump’s confidence in handling North Korea isn’t new—he made similar promises during his presidency—but his vague approach to alliances has left partners like South Korea and Japan uneasy. With global tensions high, his stance could either reignite diplomatic efforts or further destabilize trust in U.S. security guarantees. Either way, it’s a reminder of how much foreign policy could shift depending on the election outcome.

The US Senate just shot down a resolution that would have limited Trump's authority to take military action against Iran. Meanwhile, the Trump administration is reportedly gearing up to push executive actions aimed at ramping up US energy production—specifically to fuel the booming AI sector. This comes as the US and China continue their high-stakes tech rivalry.

Editor’s Note: This story matters because it highlights two big, ongoing tensions: Congress's struggle to check presidential war powers (especially concerning Iran) and the global scramble for AI dominance. The energy push shows how tech and politics are increasingly tangled—and how the US is trying to stay ahead of China. If you care about who calls the shots on war or how tech giants get their power, this is worth watching.

Former President Trump has suggested he might authorize another bombing campaign against Iran if re-elected, while also scrapping previous plans to ease sanctions. His comments came in response to Iran's Supreme Leader Khamenei's first public remarks following a tense 12-day standoff with Israel, which culminated in U.S. airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just saber-rattling—it’s a signal that tensions between the U.S. and Iran could escalate dramatically if Trump returns to office. With Iran already on edge after recent clashes, talk of more bombings and hardened sanctions could further destabilize an already volatile region. It also raises questions about how Biden’s diplomatic approach might be undone, affecting everything from nuclear negotiations to global oil markets.

Former President Donald Trump made headlines with a blunt four-word description of what he claims to have saved Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei from: an "ugly and ignominious death." The remark, likely referencing tensions during his presidency, underscores the ongoing friction between the U.S. and Iran.

In a fiery statement, former US President Donald Trump lashed out at Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei, accusing him of being driven by "anger, hatred, and disgust." Trump claimed these emotions led Khamenei to abandon negotiations on sanctions relief—and warned that if Iran resumed its nuclear activities, he wouldn’t hesitate to order military strikes.

Editor’s Note: Tensions between the US and Iran are nothing new, but Trump’s blunt threat of bombing adds fuel to an already volatile situation. With nuclear talks stalled and both sides trading sharp rhetoric, this kind of escalation raises fears of a renewed confrontation—something the world really doesn’t need right now.

Former President Donald Trump didn't mince words when asked about Iran potentially ramping up uranium enrichment—he said he'd "absolutely" authorize another military strike if the U.S. deemed it necessary. His blunt response, "Without question," signals a hardline stance reminiscent of his presidency, where tensions with Iran often flared.