Beyond the Failures: Rethinking Foundation Models in Pathology

arXiv — cs.CVThursday, December 11, 2025 at 5:00:00 AM
  • Recent analysis highlights the limitations of foundation models in pathology, indicating issues such as low accuracy, instability, and high computational demands. These challenges arise not from tuning but from fundamental mismatches in how these models represent the complexity of biological images, suggesting a need for models specifically designed for pathology rather than adaptations from natural-image methods.
  • The shortcomings in foundation models for pathology underscore the necessity for tailored approaches that can effectively handle the unique characteristics of biological images. This shift is crucial for improving diagnostic accuracy and clinical outcomes in medical settings.
  • The ongoing discourse around foundation models reflects a broader trend in medical imaging, where advancements in digital pathology and benchmarking efforts are gaining momentum. As researchers explore innovative frameworks and adaptations, the need for specialized models becomes increasingly evident, highlighting a pivotal moment in the evolution of computational pathology.
— via World Pulse Now AI Editorial System

Was this article worth reading? Share it

Recommended apps based on your readingExplore all apps
Continue Readings
A Statistical Assessment of Amortized Inference Under Signal-to-Noise Variation and Distribution Shift
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A recent study has assessed the effectiveness of amortized inference in Bayesian statistics, particularly under varying signal-to-noise ratios and distribution shifts. This method leverages deep neural networks to streamline the inference process, allowing for significant computational savings compared to traditional Bayesian approaches that require extensive likelihood evaluations.

Ready to build your own newsroom?

Subscribe to unlock a personalised feed, podcasts, newsletters, and notifications tailored to the topics you actually care about