ESSA: Evolutionary Strategies for Scalable Alignment

arXiv — cs.LGTuesday, December 23, 2025 at 5:00:00 AM
  • The introduction of ESSA, or Evolutionary Strategies for Scalable Alignment, presents a new gradient-free framework for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) using only forward inference and black-box optimization, addressing the complexities of existing methods like Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF).
  • This development is significant as it simplifies the alignment process for LLMs, making it feasible to operate at a billion-parameter scale without the extensive resource demands of traditional methods, thereby enhancing accessibility and efficiency in AI model training.
  • The emergence of ESSA aligns with ongoing efforts to improve LLM performance and safety, as seen in related frameworks that tackle issues like sampling optimality and safety degradation during fine-tuning, highlighting a broader trend towards more efficient and reliable AI systems.
— via World Pulse Now AI Editorial System

Was this article worth reading? Share it

Recommended apps based on your readingExplore all apps
Continue Readings
Surgical Refusal Ablation: Disentangling Safety from Intelligence via Concept-Guided Spectral Cleaning
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
The introduction of Surgical Refusal Ablation (SRA) aims to enhance the safety of language models by refining their refusal capabilities, minimizing collateral damage and distribution drift caused by traditional methods. SRA achieves this by creating a registry of independent Concept Atoms and utilizing ridge-regularized spectral residualization to produce a clean refusal direction.
When KV Cache Reuse Fails in Multi-Agent Systems: Cross-Candidate Interaction is Crucial for LLM Judges
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
Recent research highlights that while KV cache reuse can enhance efficiency in multi-agent large language model (LLM) systems, it can negatively impact the performance of LLM judges, leading to inconsistent selection behaviors despite stable end-task accuracy.
Your Group-Relative Advantage Is Biased
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A recent study has revealed that the group-relative advantage estimator used in Reinforcement Learning from Verifier Rewards (RLVR) is biased, systematically underestimating advantages for difficult prompts while overestimating them for easier ones. This imbalance can lead to ineffective exploration and exploitation strategies in training large language models.
PRPO: Aligning Process Reward with Outcome Reward in Policy Optimization
PositiveArtificial Intelligence
The introduction of Process Relative Policy Optimization (PRPO) aims to enhance policy optimization for large language models (LLMs) by aligning process rewards with outcome rewards, addressing the limitations of existing critic-free methods like GRPO. PRPO provides a more nuanced approach by segmenting reasoning sequences and normalizing feedback, which improves the accuracy of models such as Qwen2.5-Math-1.5B on tasks like MATH500.

Ready to build your own newsroom?

Subscribe to unlock a personalised feed, podcasts, newsletters, and notifications tailored to the topics you actually care about