On his birthday, President Trump had a phone call with Russian leader Vladimir Putin, and the bulk of their conversation revolved around Israel’s recent strike on Iran. While the details of their discussion weren’t fully disclosed, the timing and topic highlight the ongoing geopolitical tensions in the Middle East—and how the U.S. and Russia navigate them.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just a casual birthday chat—it’s a reminder of how high-stakes diplomacy often happens behind the scenes. With Israel and Iran’s escalating conflict as the backdrop, the call underscores how major powers like the U.S. and Russia are constantly maneuvering in a volatile region. Even small interactions between leaders can hint at bigger strategic moves.

Former President Donald Trump isn't taking Tucker Carlson's critiques lying down—he's firing back after the conservative commentator slammed his approach to Iran and Israel. Trump, never one to shy away from a public spat, is defending his foreign policy record in what looks like a clash of right-wing heavyweights.

Editor’s Note: This isn't just insider baseball—it's a sign of growing fractures within the conservative movement. Trump and Carlson both command huge audiences, and their feud could shape how Republican voters view foreign policy (and loyalty) heading into the election. If two of the biggest voices on the right are publicly at odds, it could ripple through the party's base.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) is calling out NYC mayoral frontrunner Eric Adams, using strong language like "unconscionable" to criticize his stance on policing and public safety. She’s doubling down on progressive concerns about his policies, signaling a potential clash between the Democratic Party’s left wing and more centrist figures.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just insider baseball—AOC’s criticism highlights a growing divide in Democratic politics, especially in cities like NYC where debates over policing and inequality are front and center. If Adams wins, progressives could push back hard on his agenda, shaping how the city handles crime, reform, and equity in the years ahead.

A fresh poll reveals that public support for President Trump's immigration and border security policies is hanging by a thread, with only a slim majority still backing his approach. It’s a sign that even his base might be wavering on what’s been a cornerstone of his presidency.

Editor’s Note: Immigration has been one of Trump’s signature issues, so slipping approval here could signal broader trouble. If even his staunchest supporters are cooling on his hardline stance, it might force a recalibration—or give opponents more ammo ahead of the election. Either way, it’s a red flag for the administration.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene is locked in a bizarre feud with Fox News host Mark Levin, with both trying to outdo each other as the bigger Trump loyalist. Instead of focusing on legislation or pressing issues, Greene seems more invested in this petty "who's more MAGA?" showdown—which, frankly, might not be the best use of her time.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just gossip—it’s a snapshot of how performative loyalty to Trump’s movement has become a weird competition among some conservatives. While Greene and Levin bicker over credentials, actual governance takes a backseat. For voters, it raises questions about priorities: Is this really what elected officials should be focused on?

Donald Trump brushed off Tucker Carlson's critique of his Iran policy and Fox News' coverage, tossing a casual jab at Carlson's career after leaving the network. At the G7 summit, Trump played coy, saying, "I don’t know what Tucker Carlson is saying," before implying Carlson should find a new gig. The exchange highlights tensions between the former allies as their political and media paths diverge.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just gossip—it’s a snapshot of how quickly alliances shift in politics and media. Trump’s dismissive remark signals he’s moving on from the Fox News era, while Carlson’s criticism reflects a growing rift among conservative voices over foreign policy. For readers, it’s a reminder that even former allies can turn into sparring partners when ideologies or ambitions clash.