Justice Department admits grand jury did not review final Comey indictment

Al JazeeraWednesday, November 19, 2025 at 7:16:40 PM
  • The Justice Department has confirmed that the grand jury did not review the final indictment related to James Comey, raising questions about the validity of the charges against him.
  • This development is significant as it could potentially undermine the prosecution's case and lead to the dismissal of the charges, which Comey's lawyers are actively pursuing.
  • The situation reflects ongoing concerns about the integrity of the Justice Department's investigative processes, especially in high
— via World Pulse Now AI Editorial System

Was this article worth reading? Share it

Recommended Readings
FBI worker says he was wrongfully terminated for having Pride flag at desk
NegativeWorld Affairs
David Maltinsky, a 16-year veteran of the FBI, has filed a lawsuit claiming he was wrongfully terminated for displaying a Pride flag at his desk. He alleges that the FBI retaliated against him for engaging in protected speech, naming FBI director Kash Patel and the Justice Department as defendants. Maltinsky describes his firing as unconstitutional and politically motivated.
US Congress approves release of Epstein files – what happens next?
NeutralWorld Affairs
The US Congress has approved a bill requiring the Justice Department to release all unclassified files related to Jeffrey Epstein. This legislative action follows significant bipartisan support, reflecting a growing demand for transparency regarding Epstein's case and the investigations surrounding it.
US House votes to force release of Epstein files
NeutralWorld Affairs
The US House of Representatives has voted to compel the Justice Department to release the remaining documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. This decision follows extensive pressure from various stakeholders, including victims of Epstein. The vote reflects a significant step towards transparency in the investigation surrounding Epstein's actions and the implications for those involved.
Congress sends Trump bill demanding release of Epstein files
PositiveWorld Affairs
The House and Senate voted overwhelmingly to demand the release of all Justice Department records related to the investigation of late financier Jeffrey Epstein. This legislative move reflects a strong bipartisan effort to enhance transparency regarding Epstein's activities and the investigations surrounding him. The bill, known as the Epstein Files Transparency Act, aims to ensure that the public has access to information that may shed light on the circumstances of Epstein's criminal actions.
LIVE: US House to vote on Epstein files’ release as Trump drops opposition
NeutralWorld Affairs
The US House of Representatives is expected to vote on the release of Justice Department files related to Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted sex offender. This vote comes after former President Donald Trump, who had previously opposed the release, has dropped his opposition. The Republican-controlled House is anticipated to pass the measure, reflecting ongoing public interest in Epstein's case and its implications.
A Chinese firm bought an insurer for CIA agents - part of Beijing's trillion dollar spending spree
NegativeWorld Affairs
A Chinese firm has acquired an insurance company that provides coverage for CIA and FBI agents, prompting the United States to tighten its investment regulations. This acquisition is part of a broader trend of significant Chinese investments in various sectors, raising concerns about national security and the implications of foreign ownership of sensitive industries.
US judge finds evidence of ‘government misconduct’ in federal case against Comey
NegativeWorld Affairs
A US judge has found evidence of 'government misconduct' in the federal case against former FBI director James Comey. The judge ruled that the Department of Justice (DoJ) engaged in 'profound investigative missteps' leading to the indictment of Comey. The court has ordered that grand jury materials be handed over to Comey's defense team, expressing concern that the DoJ's approach was to 'indict first and investigate later'. This ruling raises significant questions about the integrity of the investigation.