Trump decision for US to strike Iran splits Maga supporters – US politics live

Iran fired missiles at a US military base in Qatar, calling it retaliation for American involvement in Israeli airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. The attack follows escalating tensions between Israel and Iran, with former US President Donald Trump openly discussing regime change in Tehran. Explosions were reported near Doha, though the full extent of damage or casualties remains unclear.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just another flare-up—it’s a dangerous escalation in a region already on edge. Iran directly targeting US bases raises the stakes, and with Trump’s rhetoric in the mix, the situation feels volatile. If this spirals, it could drag in more players or even disrupt global oil supplies. Keep an eye on how Washington and Tehran respond next.

A sizable group of Labour MPs—potentially up to 100, including high-profile figures—are pushing back hard against the government’s proposed welfare cuts. They’ve tabled an amendment aimed at scrapping the bill entirely, demanding a pause to rethink the changes. This isn’t just grumbling; it’s a coordinated revolt with serious political weight behind it.

Editor’s Note: Welfare cuts hit vulnerable people hard, and this rebellion signals deep divisions even within the opposition. If enough MPs break ranks, it could force the government to backtrack or at least face a messy public fight—something neither side wants heading into an election year. It’s a story about power, policy, and who gets hurt in the process.

House Speaker Mike Johnson brushed off calls to limit former President Trump's military authority regarding Iran, telling reporters he sees no need for a war powers resolution right now. The comment comes amid heightened tensions in the Middle East, with ongoing updates on the Iran-Israel conflict.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just inside baseball—it’s about whether Congress will have a say in potential military action against Iran. Johnson’s dismissal suggests a hands-off approach, which could leave major decisions in Trump’s hands without much oversight. Given the volatile situation in the region, that’s a big deal for both foreign policy and domestic checks and balances.

Oil prices took a nosedive—dropping 7%—after Iran's missile strike on a U.S. airbase in Qatar unexpectedly eased fears of a major supply disruption. Markets had braced for chaos, but the attack’s limited scope signaled that Iran might avoid escalating tensions further, at least for now. Traders breathed a sigh of relief, sending benchmark crude prices like West Texas Intermediate down to around $68.51.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just about oil traders cashing in—it’s a sign that markets are reading geopolitical tea leaves in real time. When tensions flare in the Middle East, energy prices usually spike on fears of blocked shipping lanes or supply cuts. But this drop suggests investors think the U.S. and Iran might step back from the brink, avoiding a full-blown crisis (for now). That’s good news for drivers and businesses worried about gas prices, but it’s a fragile calm—one misstep could flip the script overnight.

New York City's mayoral primary is heating up, and all eyes are on Tuesday's election—not just because of the tight race, but also because it’s using ranked choice voting (RCV). This system lets voters rank candidates in order of preference, which could shake up how the winner is decided. It’s a big test for RCV in a major U.S. city, and the outcome might influence how other places run their elections.

Editor’s Note: This isn’t just another local election—it’s a potential game-changer for how votes are counted. If ranked choice voting works well in a city as big and diverse as New York, it could pave the way for other cities to adopt it, making elections more reflective of voter preferences. But if it backfires or causes confusion, critics will pounce. Either way, it’s a story worth watching.