Trust-Region Adaptive Policy Optimization

arXiv — cs.LGMonday, December 22, 2025 at 5:00:00 AM
  • The introduction of Trust-Region Adaptive Policy Optimization (TRAPO) addresses inefficiencies in the training of large language models (LLMs) by interleaving Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning (RL) within each training instance. This hybrid framework optimizes SFT loss on expert prefixes while allowing RL to explore the model's own completions, thus enhancing reasoning capabilities.
  • This development is significant as it resolves the inconsistency in the traditional two-stage training pipeline, which often suppresses exploration and induces forgetting, thereby limiting the potential improvements from RL. By integrating SFT and RL more effectively, TRAPO aims to enhance the overall performance of LLMs.
  • The broader implications of this advancement reflect ongoing efforts in the AI community to improve model training efficiency and effectiveness. Innovations like RLHFSpec and LEARN-Opt also seek to optimize RL training processes, while frameworks addressing safety alignment and reward function design highlight the multifaceted challenges in developing robust AI systems. These developments underscore a collective push towards refining AI methodologies to achieve better alignment with human feedback and enhanced reasoning capabilities.
— via World Pulse Now AI Editorial System

Was this article worth reading? Share it

Recommended apps based on your readingExplore all apps
Continue Readings
Ground What You See: Hallucination-Resistant MLLMs via Caption Feedback, Diversity-Aware Sampling, and Conflict Regularization
PositiveArtificial Intelligence
A recent study has introduced a framework aimed at mitigating hallucination issues in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) during Reinforcement Learning (RL) optimization. The research identifies key factors contributing to hallucinations, including over-reliance on visual reasoning and insufficient exploration diversity. The proposed framework incorporates modules for caption feedback, diversity-aware sampling, and conflict regularization to enhance model reliability.
Explaining Generalization of AI-Generated Text Detectors Through Linguistic Analysis
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A recent study published on arXiv investigates the generalization capabilities of AI-generated text detectors, revealing that while these detectors perform well on in-domain benchmarks, they often fail to generalize across various generation conditions, such as unseen prompts and different model families. The research employs a comprehensive benchmark involving multiple prompting strategies and large language models to analyze performance variance through linguistic features.
Calibration Is Not Enough: Evaluating Confidence Estimation Under Language Variations
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A recent study titled 'Calibration Is Not Enough: Evaluating Confidence Estimation Under Language Variations' highlights the limitations of current confidence estimation methods for large language models (LLMs), emphasizing the need for evaluations that account for language variations and semantic differences. The research proposes a new framework that assesses confidence quality based on robustness, stability, and sensitivity to variations in prompts and answers.
BenchOverflow: Measuring Overflow in Large Language Models via Plain-Text Prompts
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A recent study titled 'BenchOverflow' investigates a failure mode in large language models (LLMs) where plain-text prompts lead to excessive outputs, termed Overflow. This phenomenon can increase operational costs, latency, and degrade performance across users, particularly in high-demand environments.
Nationality and Region Prediction from Names: A Comparative Study of Neural Models and Large Language Models
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A recent study published on arXiv compares the effectiveness of neural models and large language models (LLMs) in predicting nationality and region from personal names. The research evaluates six neural models and six LLM prompting strategies across three levels of granularity, revealing that LLMs consistently outperform traditional models in accuracy.
Semantic Gravity Wells: Why Negative Constraints Backfire
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
A recent study published on arXiv investigates the phenomenon of negative constraints in large language models, revealing that such instructions often lead to unexpected failures. The research introduces the concept of semantic pressure, which quantitatively measures the likelihood of generating forbidden tokens, and establishes a logistic relationship between violation probability and semantic pressure.
What If TSF: A Benchmark for Reframing Forecasting as Scenario-Guided Multimodal Forecasting
NeutralArtificial Intelligence
The introduction of What If TSF (WIT) marks a significant advancement in time series forecasting by establishing a benchmark for scenario-guided multimodal forecasting. This new framework aims to evaluate the ability of models to condition forecasts on contextual text, particularly future scenarios, moving beyond traditional unimodal approaches that rely solely on historical data.
Arctic-Text2SQL-R1: Simple Rewards, Strong Reasoning in Text-to-SQL
PositiveArtificial Intelligence
Arctic-Text2SQL-R1 has been introduced as a reinforcement learning framework aimed at improving the accuracy of SQL generation from natural language queries. This model leverages a simple reward signal based on execution correctness, addressing the challenges faced by large language models in producing executable SQL, particularly for complex queries.

Ready to build your own newsroom?

Subscribe to unlock a personalised feed, podcasts, newsletters, and notifications tailored to the topics you actually care about